|
Using Data to Monitor PIP Progress
This document is also available in PDF
file.
The Texas Child and Family Services Review Team has approached their
quality assurance process in four distinct ways, and are incorporating
these tools into the social work practice of the State of Texas. Their
CFSR Program Improvement Plan (PIP) was approved in April of 2003, but
these efforts were well under way before that.
In 1987-88, efforts were made to focus on the importance of quality assurance
in the Child Welfare program throughout Texas. An Operational Audit and
Planning Process (OAPP) was developed at this time to review and evaluate
critical components, such as administration and management operations,
issues of compliance to state and federal law and regulations, community
relations, and staff/client satisfaction, to name a few. Over time, this
process evolved into the current CPS Quality Assurance System, which incorporates
the current practices utilized by the Texas Child and Family Services
Review Team.
The team is using a variety of methods to delve deeper into their data,
measuring the relevant indicators for the CFSR. They strive to look closely
at the data that exists and find ways to slice that data into sections
that make inquiry more useful, meaningful, and measurable. The benefits
of such investigation are possible modifications and enhancements in the
policy and practice of Child Protective Services in the State of Texas.
They are a team of 4, with one lead and 3 generalists, with varying backgrounds
in data and/or fieldwork.
Here is a brief description of the pieces of the “Texas Toolkit.”
1) Regional Reviews
They plan to perform periodic reviews at the regional level, to tackle
smaller slices of the population, and take the social workers and their
supervisors through the process of the CFSR. This serves the dual purpose
of educating their staff as to expectations and requirements, and allows
them to look at results in meaningful cross-sections. They also pull stakeholders
for structured interviews, in order to get an impression of the services
and the population served in that area. To date, they have performed reviews
in five regions of the state, and have plans to expand to other regions
in the current fiscal year.
2) Performance Data Profile
The Performance Data Profile, or “dashboard” is an interface
that allows them to focus on the key indicators to measure their overall
performance. They can depict graphically the strength and degree of substantial
conformity of areas of concern, so that they can better focus their energy
and training efforts. This data can be accessed on a quarterly basis,
within 15 days of the beginning of the new quarter. This helps field staff
track their progress on conformity to the outcome-related indicators,
and adjust policy and practice as indicated.
3) Automated CFSR Case Reading
They perform case file readings using a designated “period under
review.” They review randomly selected cases, and then enter the
case data through an on-line reporting tool. The tool uploads the information
to a central database and quickly calculates the scores in an automated
process. The results of all of the structured case readings are posted
on the CPS Quality Assurance Quarterly report, with region-by-region comparison,
assessable on their intranet site. An updated, Oracle-based tool is being
developed internally, that will be web-enabled and provide more functionality
to the user. As another part of the CFSR Case Reading effort, they have
created the position of Regional Case Analyst. They are
specifically trained to concentrate on the CFSR outcome measures. They
receive training in using the case reading tool, as well as Texas CPS
Policy Guidance. The Texas CFSR Team is currently working to solidify
the roles and responsibilities of this new position.
4) DEMOS (Data-Enhanced On-line Management Support)
They have partnered with the University of Texas at Arlington, School
of Social Work to develop DEMOS, using software by Speedware, an On-Line
Analytic Processing (OLAP) application. Supervisors and managers can go
to an Internet site and access data “cubes” that allow them
to drill-down into information starting from the state-wide overview,
through to regional, unit, and supervisor detail. This multi-dimensional
design allows greater flexibility in analysis for the user. Currently,
training is still being provided to managers and supervisors throughout
the state.
One challenge faced by the team is the issue of data interpretation when
utilizing “the aggregate data to drive management and practice decisions.”
It is important to make sure the data accurately reflect what was meant
to be measured initially, and have an understanding of the external factors
(e.g. seasonality spikes) that may impact data and cause “premature”
conclusions to be drawn. Additionally, it is the continued goal of the
team to emphasize the importance of integrating data management with the
clinical practices that direct service caseworkers provide, in order to
promote an understanding of how each can impact and benefit the CPS program
overall.
The tools being used in Texas are self-described as a work in progress,
constantly being honed and adjusted based on trial and error, training,
and user feedback. The CFSR team has gotten past the “why do we
have to do this” stage with the staff, as the workers are seeing
the reporting capability. They are building relationships with the users,
and hope to use their feedback in order to modify the system, add reporting
flexibility, and provide more education and training. These tools are
helping managers manage and set the direction that line-level staff need
to move towards. In subsequent years, they hope to produce more products
and tools that will directly benefit workers in their every day tasking
and prioritizing.
For more information about the tools that are being used in Texas, please
contact Brad A. Pierson, CFSR Lead, at BRAD.PIERSON@tdprs.state.tx.us.
We hope that the Tips, Tools,
and Trends series will serve to stimulate an exchange of ideas and information
among States and between systems and program staff. Your feedback is important
to us. If you have additional information on the topic presented in this
sheet, or if you have any comments or suggestions regarding its presentation
or content, please contact Tom Wetterhan of Xtria, formerly Ellsworth
Associates Inc., at (703) 821-3090 x250 or tomw@xtria.com.

This site contains links to
other web sites that may be of interest to you. The Administration
for Children and Families (ACF) / Children's Bureau (CB)
does not endorse the views expressed or the facts presented
on these sites. Their contents are solely the responsibility
of the authors and do not represent the official views
or policies of the Children's Bureau. Access to this information
does not in any way constitute an endorsement by the Department
of Health and Human Services. Furthermore, ACF/CB does
not endorse any commercial products that may be advertised
or available on these sites. |